Legal Opinion
Arthur Brune v. Charles J. Morse
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 4, 1973No. 72-1122PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
The sole issue on this appeal is the right of Arthur Bruñe to receive pension benefits from the Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund on normal retirement. The trial court, 339 F.Supp. 159, held that Bruñe was not entitled to receive benefits because he had not been employed in the “Teamster industry” for twenty continuous years. We affirm.
Various Teamster affiliates and employers with whom they had collective bargaining agreements negotiated a pension plan to be effective July 1, 1964. 1 Under the plan, an employee is eligible for normal retirement…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Taylor Roark v. John L. Lewis, Maude W. Reese, of the Last Will and Testament of Joe S. Rees(e) v. John L. Lewis, Theo R. Fuller v. John L. LewisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Walter Miniard v. John L. Lewis, Trustees, United Mine Workers of America Welfare Andretirement Fund of 1950Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Dessen v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Brune v. MorseDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1972
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lillian Yanks Rehmar v. Bernard L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Mrs. Geneva B. Phillips v. William J. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Alvares v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Horace Eugene Bayles v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Bruch v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.