Legal Opinion

Dessen v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1937No. 26411. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

On June 22, 1935, Victor Otto Dessen lost his life by drowning. Seven days thereafter, Sam G. Bulldis, as his employer, filed with the department of labor and industries a formal report of fatal accident, and about a month thereafter respondent, as the widow of deceased, filed a claim with the same department for benefits under the workmen’s compensation act. A few days later, the claim was rejected, “after full consideration,” for the reason

“ . . . that death of the deceased was not due to an injury sustained in the course of extrahazardous employment within the meaning of the workmen’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Abraham v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Edwards v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Barney v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Guerrieri v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bodine v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Peterson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Arthur Brune v. Charles J. MorseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  4. Seltenreich v. Town of FairbanksDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1952
  5. Brune v. MorseDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API