Legal Opinion

Meehan v. Laborers Pension Fund

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 24, 1976No. 75 C 2307PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WILL, District Judge.

I. Background

Thomas Meehan filed a two-count complaint on July 5,1975 charging that, despite his compliance with all the prerequisites of entitlement to pension benefits as set out in the regulations of the Laborers Pension Fund, the fund rejected his claim for a normal pension. The fund’s decision, which plaintiff appealed under the fund’s internal appeal procedures and which was affirmed, was based on the finding that Meehan, although a member of Local 4, had been employed by the Standard Oil Company from 1937 through 1960 and the American Oil Company…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Alvares v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. Al Mumford v. James M. GloverCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. James J. Reiherzer v. Daniel J. Shannon, and Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  2. O'BRIEN v. Sperry UnivacDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1978
  3. Finn v. CHICAGO NEWSPAPER PUBLISHERS'ASSOCIATION-DRIVERS UNION PENSION PLANDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1977
  4. Maita v. KilleenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Getz v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API