Legal Opinion
Alvares v. Erickson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 10, 1975No. 73-1765PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge.
The limited issues on this appeal are whether the federal court has jurisdiction of the case under § 301(a) or § 302(e), or both, of the Taft-Hartley Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 185(a) and 186(e), respectively. The district court found jurisdiction lacking. We reverse.
I. Facts.
In 1946, Local 32 and the other local unions of the United Association of Journeymen" and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the Unit*159ed States and Canada, AFL — CIO (“United Association”) in the state of Washington began joint bargaining, on a statewide basis, with employers in…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Retail Clerks International Ass'n, Local Unions Nos. 128 & 633 v. Lion Dry Goods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Iron Workers Local 272 v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Rosen v. Hotel And Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union Of Phila.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Lillian Yanks Rehmar v. Bernard L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Ellis M. Hurn v. Retirement Fund Trust of the Plumbing, Heating and Piping Industry of SoutherncaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Johnsrud v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.