Hopkins v. Hopkins
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PATROSSO, J. pro tem. *
This is the third appeal in this case, the decisions upon the prior appeals being reported in 116 Cal.App.2d 174 [253 P.2d 723] and 46 Cal.2d 313 [294 P.2d 1], In her complaint, plaintiff alleges that on October 18, 1926, the parties hereto, being then husband and wife, entered into a written property settlement agreement under and by the terms of which defendant promised and agreed to pay plaintiff the sum of $120 per month for life or until she should remarry, “and $30.00 per month for the support of the three minor children of the parties”; that plaintiff has not…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Dexter v. DexterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Colbert v. ColbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Brownrigg v. DefreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Von Brimer v. Whirlpool CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1973
- Blackburn v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- People v. EnskatAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1971