Legal Opinion
People v. Enskat
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided September 21, 1971No. Crim. A. No. 10330PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZACK, J.
The complaint charges appellant with two counts of violations of section 311.2 of the Penal Code in the exhibition, on September 19, 1970, of motion pictures entitled “The Collection,” and “Man to Man,” respectively. An exhaustive statement of the evidence which led to a conviction on the first count, after jury trial, is unnecessary, except as to the specific issues discussed below. It suffices, at this point, to note that no females were involved in the picture, and that the material involved a potpourri of scenes depicting male genitalia in various conditions arising out of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- A Book Named "John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure" v. Attorney General of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Time Incorporated v. Bernard Geis AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Landau v. FordingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. EnskatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Bryers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- People v. MoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- People v. GouletAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1971
- People v. P.P.G., Inc.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1978