Noxon Chemical Products Co. v. Leckie
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSON, District Judge.
It must, of course, be understood, that the decision of the court in the proceedings in which the receivers were appointed is not open for reconsideration, either directly or indirectly, on these appeals. That chapter is closed. The well-established principles of the law, as there enunciated and applied, fully justify the conclusion reached, if any justification is necessary.
But in order to better understand the present status of the parties, and their resulting rights, a brief review of the action of the court in that case, and the legal situation which impelled that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Prendergast v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Atlantic Trust Co. v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. KaratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Finneran v. BurtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- Fryer v. WeakleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re Axona International Credit & Commerce Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Gorton v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Bowersock Mills & Power Co. v. JoyceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Red Dragon Diner, Inc. v. Superior CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.