Legal Opinion

Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. Karatz

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 21, 1923No. 574, 467PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice Brandéis

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The decision in these cases rendered April 23,1923, ante, 77, reversed the decrees with costs and directed that the bills be dismissed. Before the mandate issued Hertz and Levin, the receivers appointed by the federal court for Minnesota, applied for modification of the decrees. They ask approval of the disbursements for expenses of the receivership paid by them out of monies realized from assets of the Lion Bonding & Surety Company. They ask approval of charges made by counsel employed in certain ancillary proceedings which these counsel…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. In Re Watts and SachsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Randolph v. ScruggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Palmer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Citizens' Bank v. CannonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Gross v. Irving Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Burnrite Coal Briquette Co. v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. First Nat. Bank of Cincinnati v. FlershemSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Emil v. HanleySupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API