Legal Opinion
Forrester v. Martin
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided June 23, 2011No. 11-112PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JIM HANNAH, Chief Justice.
1 .April Forrester, individually and as a representative of all similarly situated voter-citizens, appeals from a November 2, 2010 order entered in Pulaski County Circuit Court denying Forrester’s request for injunctive relief and writ of mandamus against the Arkansas Secretary of State regarding proposed constitutional amendment designated “Issue No. 2,” now codified as amendment 89. On appeal, Forres-ter asserts that the circuit court erred because amendment 89 violated Arkansas Constitution, article 19, section 22 in that it actually 12included three separate…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chaney v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Becker v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Becker v. RiviereSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Dachs v. HendrixSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Central Oklahoma Pipeline, Inc. v. Hawk Field Services, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- Arnold v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
- Bakalekos v. FurlowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
- Bakalekos v. FurlowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
- Shelly Buonauito, Mary Weeks, Verlon Abrams, and Sarah B. Thompson v. Keith Gibson, Tom Schueck, Robert S. Moore, Jr., Alec Farmer, and Philip Taldo, Members of the Arkansas State Highway Commission; Scott E. Bennett, Director, Arkansas Department of Transportation; Dennis Milligan, Treasurer of the State of Arkansas; Andrea Lea, Auditor of the State of Arkansas; Larry W. Walther, Director, Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration; And Asa Hutchinson, Governor of the State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.