Legal Opinion

Chaney v. Bryant

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 17, 1976No. 75-258PublishedCited by 442 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

By an amended complaint, appellants sought to have Amendment 54 to our state constitution, which was proposed by the General Assembly and submitted to the people at the 1974 General Election, declared void on the ground that the ballot title was misleading in that it misrepresented the changes the adoption of this amendment would bring about. Appellee filed a demurrer on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action because no facts were alleged that violated any rights of appellants. This demurrer was sustained and the complaint…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Pafford v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. People ex rel. Elder v. SoursSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
  3. Constitutional Prohibitory AmendmentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  4. Keenan v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Hammond v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by442 opinions

  1. Becker v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Parker v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Vandiver v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  4. City of Glendale v. BuchananSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  5. Crochet v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

437 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API