Legal Opinion

Becker v. Riviere

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 26, 1982No. 82-221PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richard B. Adkisson, Chief Justice.

Appellants brought an action in the chancery court of Pulaski County to enjoin appellee, Paul Riviere, Secretary of State, from furnishing the State Board and County Boards of Election Commissioners with the “Ballot Title” of proposed Amendment 60. The trial court held that, although not required, the “Ballot Title” was sufficient and refused to grant the injunction. On appeal, we affirm.

Proposed Amendment 60, which deals with interest rates on loans, was promulgated by House Joint Resolution 7 of the 1981 General Assembly. It was proposed pursuant to Art.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hoban v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  2. Bradley v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  3. Jones v. McDadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Becker v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Kurrus Ex Rel. Arkansans to Protect Police, Libraries, Education, & Services (APPLES) v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Ferstl v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Walmsley v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Thiel v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API