Legal Opinion

Bakalekos v. Furlow

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 1, 2011No. 11-526PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COURTNEY HUDSON GOODSON, Justice.

| iAppellants Michael Bakalekos, and others, appeal the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing their complaint in which they mounted a multi-pronged challenge to an increase in benefits approved by appellee Policemen’s Pension and Relief Fund of the City of Little Rock, Arkansas (“Fund”), acting through the members of its Board of Trustees, appellees Brad Furlow, Lee Harrod, Far-ris Hensley, Sara Lenehan, Mike Lowery, Albert Miller, and Bruce Moore (collectively “Board”). For reversal, appellants contend that the circuit court erred (1) in ruling…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McCoy v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Eady v. LansfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. McQuay v. Arkansas State Board of ArchitectsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Rose v. Arkansas State Plant BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Dachs v. HendrixSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. DIRECTV, Inc. v. MurraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  2. Landers v. StoneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  3. McDaniel v. SpencerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  4. Bank of the Ozarks v. CosseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  5. Graves v. Greene CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API