Legal Opinion

Adams v. Burlington Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 15, 1983No. 8210IC389PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRASWELL, Judge.

Under the North Carolina Workers’ Compensation Act, an injury arising out of and in the course of employment is compen-sable only if caused by an “accident.” G.S. 97-2(6); Porter v. Shelby Knit, Inc., 46 N.C. App. 22, 264 S.E. 2d 360 (1980). The primary question raised by defendants in this appeal is whether plaintiffs back injury resulted from an “accident.”

“Our Supreme Court has defined the term ‘accident’ as used in the Workers’ Compensation Act as ‘an unlooked for and untoward event which is not expected or designed by the person who suffers the injury.’ Hensley v.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harding v. THOMAS AND HOWARD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Hensley v. Farmers Federation Co-OperativeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Porter v. Shelby Knit, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Rhinehart v. Roberts Super Market, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Richards v. Town of ValdeseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Fish v. Steelcase, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Calderwood v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Holshouser v. Shaner Hotel Group Properties One Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Pitillo v. N.C. Department of Environmental Health & Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API