Legal Opinion

Ingalls v. Maine Central Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 28, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

“The rule in this state, when no trial except trial by jury is contemplated, is, that the plaintiff, before opening his case to the jury, may become nonsuit as a matter of right: after the case is opened, and before the verdict, leave to become nonsuit is within the discretion of the court: after verdict there can be no nonsuit.” Doe, J., in Fulford v. Converse, 54 N. H. 543, 544. See also Judge of Probate v. Abbot, 13 N. H. 21; Stevenson v. Cofferin, 20 N. H. 288, 292; Wright v. Bartlett, 45 N. H. 289, 290; Pollard v. Moore, 51 N. H. 188, 191; Farr v. Cate, 58 N. H. 367; Benton v. Bellows,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bunten v. DavisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  2. Crugley v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919
  3. Simpson v. GafneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1891
  4. Stowe v. PayneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
  5. Rockwell v. HustisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bonin v. HowardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  2. Watkins v. HolmesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943
  3. N. E. Redlon Co. v. Franklin Square Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940
  4. Buffum v. BuffumSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API