Legal Opinion

Rockwell v. Hustis

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 29, 1918PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

The evidence tended to show the following facts: the plaintiffs were employed by the defendant as section hands and were engaged in that employment when they received the injuries on account of which these suits were brought. They were riding upon a motor-driven section car with six other employees, and on account of the size of the car they were obliged to sit close together upon a narrow seat running lengthwise of the car, four facing in one direction and four in the other. Upon the floor were various tools used by them in their work, which prevented them from placing their feet firmly upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boucher v. LarochelleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908
  2. Castonia v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1917
  3. Topore v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1916
  4. Warburton v. N. B. Thayer Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bridges v. Great Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  2. Alden Speares Sons Co. v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1921
  3. Ingalls v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  4. Corbett v. HinesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API