Bunten v. Davis
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, C. J.
The defendant Mary E. Davis being the chief actor in the occurrences here involved, is spoken of herein as the defendant.
The evidence discloses two quite different versions of the occurrences leading up to the shooting. The plaintiff has argued his case upon the hypothesis that his version is to be taken to be the true one. But as the exceptions here presented relate to the admissibility of further evidence, the question is whether there was anything in the evidence already in the case to warrant the introduction of the offered proof. If it would tend to show a defense, taken in connection…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. LaroseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
- Bourassa v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1909
- Whitcher v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1899
- Sevigny v. J. Spaulding & Sons Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1924
- State v. SmallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1917
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Roland W. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- State v. WarnerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
- State v. WhitenerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
- Sherwin-Williams Company v. Perry CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Appeal of BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.