Legal Opinion

Malcolm v. Little

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided August 8, 1972PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAREY, Justice:

In this appeal from the Superior Court, the appellants seek the reversal of a judgment in favor of the appellees, entered after a jury trial in an action for illegal eviction and conversion. The jury awarded compensatory and punitive damages, with a small deduction allowed on appellants’ counter-claim.

The appellant Martha Malcolm is the owner of an apartment building; the appellant Homer Malcolm is her son and admitted agent for all of her affairs concerning the building. They are herein referred to as “appellants.” The appellee Betty Ellen Little is the mother of appellees…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Riegel v. Aastad Ex Rel. AastadSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
  2. Knight v. HaleySuperior Court of Delaware · 1934
  3. King v. FirmUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Pefkaros v. HarmanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
  5. Peterson v. PlattUtah Supreme Court · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jardel Co., Inc. v. HughesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  2. Mendes v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Storey v. CamperSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  4. Cassaundra Spinks v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Kuriger v. CramerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API