Legal Opinion

Kuriger v. Cramer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 13, 1985No. 1419PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, President Judge:

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion to remove a compulsory non-suit. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in entering the non-suit, and therefore reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

The facts must be stated in the light most favorable to appellant, for she was the plaintiff below. 1 So stated, they are as follows.

Appellant rented a mobile home from appellee. The term of the lease was from January 10, 1982, through January 10, 1983, and the rent was $225.00 per month; appellant paid a security deposit of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Pugh v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Klemow v. Time IncorporatedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Mendes v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Wilson v. King of Prussia Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Aponte v. Aungst (In Re Aponte)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Emge v. HagoskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. In Re AdamsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Durkin v. Equine Clinics, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Kovalev v. SowellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API