Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Platt
Utah Supreme Court
Decided April 1, 1965No. 10096PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WADE, Justice:
The plaintiffs Peterson and wife, respondents here, sued defendants Platt and Bees- ley, appellants here, for forcible entry and detainer and conversion of personal property connected with the lease and possession of the lot and buildings thereon known as Arctic Circle Drive-In at Highland Drive and Gunn Avenue in Salt Lake City. The trial court awarded the Petersons a judgment against Platt for conversion of materials and equipment on the property and for mental anguish and punitive damages in the total sum of $13,650.04. From this judgment the defendant Platt appeals.
On June…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Buchanan v. CritesUtah Supreme Court · 1944
- King v. FirmUtah Supreme Court · 1955
- Paxton v. Fisher, Secretary St. Land Bd.Utah Supreme Court · 1935
- Lambert v. SineUtah Supreme Court · 1953
- Woodbury v. BunkerUtah Supreme Court · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Frisco Joes, Inc. v. PeayUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- Freeway Park Building, Inc. v. Western States Wholesale SupplyUtah Supreme Court · 1969
- Malcolm v. LittleSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
- Aris Vision Institute, Inc. v. Wasatch Property Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2005
- Aris Vision Institute, Inc. v. Wasatch Property Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.