Legal Opinion

Black Hills Novelty Co. v. South Dakota Commission on Gaming

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1994No. 18245, 18257PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, Chief Justice

(on reassignment).

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment action in which a trial court determined the enactment of ARSD 20:18:17:24.14 was an unconstitutional exercise of authority by the South Dakota Commission on Gaming. We reverse and remand.

*72 FACTS

“Quartermania” is the trade name for a group of progressive slot machines in Deadwood, South Dakota. “Progressive” means the jackpot increases each time a machine on the Quartermania system is played. The Quartermania machines at different casinos are electronically connected to a “progressive controller” which continuously monitors each…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Mash v. CutlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Oahe Conservancy Subdistrict v. JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. In Re Application of SDDS, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Staab v. CameronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re Sdds, Inc., a South Dakota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  2. Grand State Property, Inc. v. Woods, Fuller, Shultz, & Smith, P.C.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. National Food Corp. v. Aurora County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Rehm v. LenzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. SDDS, Inc. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API