Black Hills Novelty Co. v. South Dakota Commission on Gaming
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, Chief Justice
(on reassignment).
This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment action in which a trial court determined the enactment of ARSD 20:18:17:24.14 was an unconstitutional exercise of authority by the South Dakota Commission on Gaming. We reverse and remand.
*72 FACTS
“Quartermania” is the trade name for a group of progressive slot machines in Deadwood, South Dakota. “Progressive” means the jackpot increases each time a machine on the Quartermania system is played. The Quartermania machines at different casinos are electronically connected to a “progressive controller” which continuously monitors each…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Mash v. CutlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Oahe Conservancy Subdistrict v. JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re Application of SDDS, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Staab v. CameronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re Sdds, Inc., a South Dakota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Grand State Property, Inc. v. Woods, Fuller, Shultz, & Smith, P.C.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- National Food Corp. v. Aurora County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Rehm v. LenzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- SDDS, Inc. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.