Legal Opinion

Rehm v. Lenz

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1996No. NonePublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[¶ 1] MILLER, Chief Justice,

delivers the majority opinion of the Court on that part of Issue I which applies a six-year statute of limitations to the claims against Lenz and reverses and remands for trial the summary judgment in favor of Lenz, and on Issue II.

[¶ 2] SABERS, Justice, delivers the majority opinion of the Court on that part of Issue I holding that the two-year medical malpractice statute of limitations applies to a psychologist treating depression.

*563[¶ 3] MILLER, Chief Justice, writing the majority opinion on that part of Issue I which applies a six-year statute of limitations to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Jerrie M. Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Marquay v. EnoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  3. Morgan v. BaldwinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Schoenrock v. TappeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Nelson v. Nelson Cattle Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Kirlin v. HalversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Peterson, Ex Rel. Peterson v. BurnsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Knudson v. HessSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Horne v. CrozierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API