Legal Opinion

Herron v. Fannie Mae

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 30, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-0943PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.

This suit arises from the termination of a consulting contract between Caroline Herron and Fannie Mae. Ms. Herron worked for Fannie Mae as an employee and then as a contractor until she was terminated in January 2010. She alleges that she was terminated due to her complaints that Fannie Mae (1) acted improperly in its role assisting the U.S. Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) with home loan modifications, (2) wasted public funds, and (3) violated its contract with Treasury. Compl. [Dkt. 1] ¶ 1. Ms. Herron pleads in the alternative. If…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. American Nat. Ins. Co. v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Caroline Herron v. Fannie MaeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  2. United States Ex Rel. Petras v. Simparel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  3. Sisti v. Fed. Hous. Fin. AgencyDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2018
  4. Federal Housing Finance Agency v. Countrywide Financial Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
  5. Henok v. Chase Home Finance, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API