Legal Opinion
Sisti v. Fed. Hous. Fin. Agency
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided August 2, 2018No. C.A. No. 17-005-JJM-LDA; C.A. No. 17-042-JJM-LDAPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN J. MCCONNELL, JR., United States District Judge
The Plaintiffs in these cases seek a ruling that Defendants Federal Housing Finance Agency ("FHFA"), Federal National Mortgage Association ("Fannie Mae"), and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac") are government actors, and thus, violated the Plaintiffs' Fifth Amendment due process rights when they conducted non-judicial foreclosures on the Plaintiffs' homes. The Defendants have moved for judgment on the pleadings. For the following reasons, their motions are DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
Because the Defendants have moved for judgment…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Plessy v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Ex Parte VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Montilla v. Federal Nat'l Mortgage Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- Trilisky v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
- Akanthos Opportunity Fund, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Appaloosa Investment Limited Partnership I v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Arrowood Indemnity Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.