Legal Opinion

Arundel v. Arundel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 25, 1979No. 48391PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAHL, Justice.

Appellant-Petitioner Sharon Arundel challenges the division of property and the provisions for alimony and life insurance in this appeal from a Hennepin County District Court judgment and amended judgment dissolving the marriage of the parties. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for modification of the judgment.

In this case, we are dealing with the dissolution of a traditional marriage of many years’ duration and considerable wealth. The parties, married 29 years, have five children, one of whom was a minor at the time of trial. The wife, 51, with one year of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bollenbach v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Cooper v. CooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Botkin v. BotkinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Cashman v. CashmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Marriage of McClelland v. McClellandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. In Re the Marriage of O'Brien v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  4. Marriage of Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Marriage of Kostelnik v. KostelnikCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API