Legal Opinion

Rohrbaugh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELTON, Senior Judge.

In this case, due to a power company terminating electric service at a rental property during a period of sub-zero temperature weather conditions, a house was extensively damaged as a result of the freezing and rupturing of radiators and the water system. We are called upon to determine whether and to what extent a power company owes a duty of care to ensure that owners of a rental property are aware that the power company intends to terminate electric service during a period of harsh winter weather conditions.

Here, the owners of the rental property (the Rohrbaughs)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. At & T Communications v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Honey Brook Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pager v. Metropolitan EdisonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Rohrbaugh v. Pennsylvania PUCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Rohrbaugh v. Pennsylvania PUCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API