Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELTON, Senior Judge.
Irwin A. Popowsky (Consumer Advocate) petitions for review of the November 19,1993 order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) adopting the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ’s) September 9, 1993 recommended decision dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction Metropolitan Edison’s (Met-Ed’s) and Pennsylvania Electric Company’s (Penelec’s) joint petition for 1) authority to implement a conditioned power service program; and 2) approval of certain modifications and/or supplements to its existing tariffs in order to implement the program.1 We reverse and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Elkin v. Bell Tel. Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Morrow v. BELL TELE. CO. OF PENNSYLVANIASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Elkin v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- PECO Energy Co. v. Township of Upper DublinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Rohrbaugh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995