Legal Opinion

Honey Brook Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 25, 1994No. 2807 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE1 , Judge.

Honey Brook Water Company has appealed a decision of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) which denied Honey Brook’s exceptions to the order of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) which had sustained the formal complaints of Margaret Shulzitski, Mr. and Mrs. Raymond J. Sakrewsky, Edward T. and Arlene S. Burgess and Bonita Hoats (collectively, Complainants).

Facts

On April 15, 1992, Complainants filed formal complaints against the Honey Brook Water Company which were accom*143panied by a petition signed by twenty-six (26) residents of the Spring Mountain area, known as the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wiley v. WoodsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Carter v. KublerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Bell Tel. Co. of Pennsylvania v. SannerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Pocono Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dee-Dee Cab, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Air-Serv Group, LLC v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Rohrbaugh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Air-Serv Group, LLC v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API