Legal Opinion
Pager v. Metropolitan Edison
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 27, 2019No. 3:17-cv-00934Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WILLIAM PAGER, et al., Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-cv-00934 v. (SAPORITO, M.J.) METROPOLITAN EDISON, a/k/a MET-ED FIRSTENERGYCORP., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM This is a diversity action brought by New York residents William and Jenna Pager, a married couple, against several corporate defendants: (a) FirstEnergy Corp. (“FirstEnergy”), an Ohio corporation with its principal office in Akron, Ohio; (b) Metropolitan Edison a/k/a Met-Ed (“Met-Ed”), a Pennsylvania corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of FirstEnergy with its…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kelley Mala v. Crown Bay MarinaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Reginald D. Ware Ware Communications, Inc. v. Rodale Press, Inc. Ware CommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.