Legal Opinion
Mitroff v. Xomox Corp.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 22, 1985No. Civ. No. C-1-83-924PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARL B. RUBIN, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court under the following circumstances. On October 19, 1984, plaintiff Walter Mitroff was awarded damages by a jury pursuant to his action brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. On January 30, 1985, plaintiff filed a Motion for Award of Attorney Fees in the sum of $91,199.56 and for an award of costs in the sum of $5,936.26 (doc. no. 86). On February 19,1985, defendant filed a memorandum contra to plaintiff’s Motion (doc. no. 89). On page 2 of such memorandum, the following appears:
“...…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Deborah A. Northcross, Cross-Appellees v. Board of Education of the Memphis City Schools, Cross-Appellants, and City of Memphis, Added Cross-Appellants. Deborah A. Northcross, Cross-Appellees v. Board of Education of the Memphis City Schools, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Brinkman v. GilliganDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
- Mark Brinkman v. John J. Gilligan, Dayton Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
3Cited by5 opinions
- Serricchio v. Wachovia Securities, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Kimmel v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Garcia v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- Manjot Kaur v. Todd M. Lyons, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026
- Sidibe Karidjatou v. Unknown Party, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026