Brinkman v. Gilligan
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARL B. RUBIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
A. The Northcross Standard
Attorney fees in a school desegregation case in this Circuit are governed by Northcross v. Board of Education of Memphis City Schools, 611 F.2d 624 (6th Cir.1979) (hereinafter “Northcross”). A reasonable fee is the product of [1] the number of hours reasonably expended times [2] the customary rate for such hours.
Northcross specifically prohibits the use of a “multiplier”. The majority opinion reaffirms this position first taken in Oliver v. Kalamazoo Board of Education, 576 F.2d 714 (6th Cir.1978).
In pointing out that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Milliken v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Dayton Board of Education v. BrinkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Columbus Board of Education v. PenickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mitroff v. Xomox Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
- Berry v. School Dist. of City of Benton HarborDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1986