Legal Opinion

Brinkman v. Gilligan

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 26, 1982No. Civ. C-3-75-304PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CARL B. RUBIN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

A. The Northcross Standard

Attorney fees in a school desegregation case in this Circuit are governed by Northcross v. Board of Education of Memphis City Schools, 611 F.2d 624 (6th Cir.1979) (hereinafter “Northcross”). A reasonable fee is the product of [1] the number of hours reasonably expended times [2] the customary rate for such hours.

Northcross specifically prohibits the use of a “multiplier”. The majority opinion reaffirms this position first taken in Oliver v. Kalamazoo Board of Education, 576 F.2d 714 (6th Cir.1978).

In pointing out that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Milliken v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Dayton Board of Education v. BrinkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Columbus Board of Education v. PenickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mitroff v. Xomox Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
  2. Berry v. School Dist. of City of Benton HarborDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API