Legal Opinion

Kimmel v. State of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Peradotto, J.

The primary question presented by this appeal is whether a prevailing plaintiff in a sex discrimination action against the State may recover attorneys’ fees and expenses pursuant to the New York State Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) (CPLR art 86). We agree with plaintiff and her former attorney, appellant Emmelyn Logan-Baldwin, that they are entitled to seek attorneys’ fees and expenses under the plain language of the EAJA.

Facts and Procedural History

Plaintiff, a former State Trooper, commenced this action in 1995 alleging that she was subjected to…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ciesinski v. Town of AuroraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Riley v. County of BroomeNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Sega v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Mills v. County of MonroeNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rocco v. Goldberg (In re Goldberg)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  2. Imhof v. New York CIty Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API