Legal Opinion

Mark Brinkman v. John J. Gilligan, Dayton Board of Education

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 17, 1983No. 82-3155PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal involves attorney fees and costs allowed by the district court for five attorneys in this protracted school desegregation case. The district court allowed a total of $383,540.25 in attorney fees and $48,868.57 for reimbursement of costs and expenses, all to be paid by the defendants. Four attorneys and the personal representative of the fifth attorney, now deceased, challenge the allowances as inadequate and claim $1,210,291.50 as reasonable attorney fees and $49,569.46 for out of pocket expenses.

The reported decisions in this protracted litigation are as follows: Dayton Board of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dayton Board of Education v. BrinkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Dayton Board of Education v. BrinkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Deborah A. Northcross, Cross-Appellees v. Board of Education of the Memphis City Schools, Cross-Appellants, and City of Memphis, Added Cross-Appellants. Deborah A. Northcross, Cross-Appellees v. Board of Education of the Memphis City Schools, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  4. Mark Brinkman v. John J. Gilligan, Mark Brinkman v. Dayton Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  5. Mark Brinkman v. John J. GilliganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vaughns v. Bd. of Educ. of Prince George's CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1984
  2. Mitroff v. Xomox Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API