Legal Opinion
Serricchio v. Wachovia Securities, LLC
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 17, 2009No. Civil No. 3:05cv1761 (JBA)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS TO QUASH
JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge.
“A request for attorney’s fees should not result in a second major litigation.” Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 437, 103 S.Ct. 1933, 76 L.Ed.2d 40 (1983). Nevertheless, Plaintiff Michael Serricchio and Defendant Wachovia Securities, LLC (“Wachovia”) once again stake out diametrically opposing positions in this case, this time concerning the reasonableness of Serricchio’s request for attorney’s fees and costs following judgment in his favor. See generally Serricchio v. Wa-chovia Securities, LLC, 606 F.Supp.2d 256, 268…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Arbor Hill Concerned Citizens Neighborhood Ass'n v. County of Albany & Albany County Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Robinson v. City of EdmondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Martha Johnson and Delores J. Ceballos, Etc. v. University College of the University of Alabama in Birmingham George W. Campbell, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Serricchio v. Wachovia Securities, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Mendez v. Radec Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2011
- Costa v. Sears Home Improvement Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2016