Legal Opinion
Meyerson v. New York Telephone Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 10, 1971PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDominio S. Rinaldi, J.
The plaintiffs, in this action charging defendant New York Telephone Company with failure and refusal to provide adequate telephone service as required by section 91 of the Public Service Law, move for a preliminary injunction directing defendant to provide them with adequate service, to take the necessary steps in order to provide such service and enjoining the defendant in the interim from terminating or interfering with current service.
Defendant cross-moves for an order pursuant to CPLR 3211 dismissing the complaint upon the grounds that the court does not have jurisdiction of the subject…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jacob Goodman & Co. v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Earl Carroll Realty Corp. v. New York Edison Co.New York Supreme Court · 1931
- Jacob Goodman & Co. v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Leighton v. New York Telephone Co.New York Supreme Court · 1945
- Carlson Construction Co. v. New York Telephone Co.New York Supreme Court · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Behrend v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Jeffries v. Glacier State Telephone Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Campbell v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Moore v. Pacific Northwest BellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Abraham v. New York Telephone Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.