Legal Opinion
Jacob Goodman & Co. v. New York Telephone Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 8, 1955PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.
These two actions challenge the propriety of the billing method in use by the New York Telephone Compan; (hereinafter called the Company) since 1950. At that time following hearings before the Public Service Commission (here inafter called the Commission), the Company extended its Nev York City dial system into Nassau and lower Westchestei counties, and thereafter, in pursuance of its duty to collect th( New York City sales tax, billed plaintiff, and other subscriber; similarly situated, 3% on concededly nontaxable calls dialed t( points outside the city limits as well as on admittedly…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- James v. Alderton Dock Yards, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- New York Foreign Trade Zone Operators, Inc. v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Kovarsky v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Bareham v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
3Cited by22 opinions
- Cortlandt Nursing Home v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Gaynor v. RockefellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- DuPont Glore Forgan Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Civil Service Forum v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. General Telephone Company of California and General Telephone and Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.