Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 19, 1978No. 1 CA-CIV 3503PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EUBANK, Judge.

FACTS AND ISSUES

The primary question raised by this appeal is whether A.R.S. § 40-241 et seq., and § 40-321 et seq., or the doctrine of primary jurisdiction, require the appellant, Madeline Campbell, to assert her tort and breach of contract claims against appellees in a complaint to the Arizona Corporation Commission before suing on those claims in Superi- or Court. The trial court was of the opinion that such “prior resort” to the Commission was required and granted appellees’ Motion to Dismiss, made pursuant to Rule 12, Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S. Appellant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Gregg v. Delhi-Taylor Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Grever v. Idaho Telephone CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Campbell v. ChatwinArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State Ex Rel. Church v. Arizona Corp. CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Atkin Wright & Miles v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. J.W. Hancock Enterprises, Inc. v. Arizona State Registrar of ContractorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  3. Beaver v. Qwest, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Estate of Bohn v. WaddellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  5. Southwest Soil Remediation, Inc. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API