Legal Opinion
Carlson Construction Co. v. New York Telephone Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1964PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
John P. Cohalan, Jr., J.
In this rather unusual case, which was tried before the court without a jury, plaintiff corporation seeks one amount of monetary relief, but bases its claim on three distinct causes of action. They sound respectively in breach of contract, gross negligence and violation of statutory duty.
Having commenced its corporate existence in 1948, plaintiff removed its base of operations from Amityville to Lindenhurst in the year 1954. It kept its old telephone number and applied for and was given an additional one at its new location. The new number, TU 8-3030, it retained…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. AngeloNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Kerr Steamship Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Emery v. Rochester Telephone Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1935
- Emery v. Rochester Telephone Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Emery v. Rochester Telephone Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Vitol Trading S.A., Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Sgs Control Services, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Meyerson v. New York Telephone Co.New York Supreme Court · 1971
- Warren v. New York Telephone Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1972
- Babitt v. New York Telephone Co.Albany City Court · 1970
- Driscoll v. New York Telephone Co.New York Supreme Court · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.