State v. Medina
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
¶ 1. Defendants in these consolidated cases challenge as unconstitutional a recent amendment to Vermont’s DNA-database statute that, as of July 1, 2011, mandates warrantless, suspicionless DNA collection and analysis from anyone arraigned for a felony after a determination of probable cause. 20 V.S.A. § 1933(a)(2). All five of the trial courts in these cases found that the amendment authorizes unconstitutional searches and seizures, either under the Vermont Constitution, Chapter I, Article 11, or under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, or both. We affirm, addressing only the…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. BuzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. Bogert, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- State v. Ronald DupuisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- State v. Donald BouchardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- State v. EdelmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.