Legal Opinion
State v. Bogert, Jr.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 10, 2014No. 2011-253PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
¶ 1. This case tests the permissibility, under the Vermont Constitution, of a warrantless and suspicionless search of a convicted sex offender furloughed to his home and subject to a standard condition of a conditional-reentry agreement that provides for such searches. We conclude that the search in this case satisfied the requirements of the Federal and Vermont constitutions and, accordingly, affirm. 2
¶2. In January 2005, defendant Thomas Bogert, Jr. pleaded guilty to two counts of possession of child pornography, no contest to one count of aggravated sexual assault, and no contest to one…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. Billy Joe PutnamSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- State v. Tristan CameronSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- State v. Owen CornellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- State v. Patricia KaneSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- State v. Allan WashburnSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.