Legal Opinion

State v. Ronald Dupuis

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 17, 2018No. 2017-344PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

¶ 1. In State v. Kirchoff this Court held that Chapter I, Article 11 of the Vermont Constitution protects against warrantless searches of "open fields" when the landowner objectively demonstrates his or her intent for privacy through actions such as posting "no trespass" signs. 156 Vt. 1 , 10, 587 A.2d 988 , 994 (1991). This case now calls on us to examine whether Article 11 provides the same protection when the warrantless search is for the purpose of enforcing hunting laws and the landowner has not strictly abided by Vermont's regulations for posting against hunting. The State appeals from…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. State v. BullockMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. KirchoffSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Clyde S. BovatSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
  2. Hollins v. South Burlington Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2020
  3. Punxsutawney Hunting Club v. PGCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API