State v. Edelman
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
¶ 1. This case asks whether Vermont's implied consent statute precludes a defendant from arguing that the results of an evidentiary breath test should be suppressed because the defendant's consent to the evidentiary breath test was not voluntary. Defendant Walker Edelman appeals a trial court order denying his motion to suppress and dismiss, in which the trial court concluded that the Legislature had effectively granted automatic and presumptive consent to an evidentiary breath test by means of the implied consent statute and therefore defendant could not challenge admission of an evidentiary…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. ZaccaroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- State v. McGuiganSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- State v. MuzzySupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. Peter John Williams / State v. Peter J. BoissoneaultSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- State v. Kent EatonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2026