Legal Opinion

CITY OF OAKLAND, CAL. v. Hotels. Com LP

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 16, 2009No. 07-17258PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION

The Opinion filed on July 16, 2009, is amended as follows: On page 959, strike the following text:

The “hotel tax” in California derives from a state law that permits municipalities to “levy a tax on the privilege of occupying a room or rooms, or other living space, in a hotel, inn, tourist home or house, or other lodging.” Cal. Rev. & Tax Code § 7280(a).

and insert the following text:

Oakland’s authority to enact a “hotel tax” is derived from the city’s status as a “Charter City.” See City of San Bernadino Hotel/Motel Ass’n v. City of San Bernadino, 59 Cal.App.4th 237,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. TerhuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. O'GUINN v. Lovelock Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Campbell v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Ogo Associates v. City of TorranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Horack v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State of Missouri v. Kamala HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Payne Ex Rel. D.P. v. Peninsula School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. County of Monroe v. Priceline.Com, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
  4. South Peninsula Hospital v. Xerox State Healthcare LLCDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2016
  5. Payne Ex Rel. D.P. v. Peninsula School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API