CITY OF OAKLAND, CAL. v. Hotels. Com LP
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
The Opinion filed on July 16, 2009, is amended as follows: On page 959, strike the following text:
The “hotel tax” in California derives from a state law that permits municipalities to “levy a tax on the privilege of occupying a room or rooms, or other living space, in a hotel, inn, tourist home or house, or other lodging.” Cal. Rev. & Tax Code § 7280(a).
and insert the following text:
Oakland’s authority to enact a “hotel tax” is derived from the city’s status as a “Charter City.” See City of San Bernadino Hotel/Motel Ass’n v. City of San Bernadino, 59 Cal.App.4th 237,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wyatt v. TerhuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- O'GUINN v. Lovelock Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Campbell v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Ogo Associates v. City of TorranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Horack v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State of Missouri v. Kamala HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Payne Ex Rel. D.P. v. Peninsula School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- County of Monroe v. Priceline.Com, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
- South Peninsula Hospital v. Xerox State Healthcare LLCDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2016
- Payne Ex Rel. D.P. v. Peninsula School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.