Legal Opinion
State of Missouri v. Kamala Harris
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 17, 2016No. 14-17111PublishedCited by 251 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed November 17, 2016, and published at 842 F.3d 658, is amended by the opinion filed concurrently with this order. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed.
OPINION
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
California enacted laws and regulations prescribing standards for the conditions under which chickens must be kept in order for their eggs to be sold in the state. Plaintiffs are six states, which sued to block enforcement of those laws and regulations before they took effect. We agree with the district court that Plaintiffs lacked standing to bring this case as…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Dougherty v. City of CovinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by251 opinions
- Steven Bassett v. Abm Parking ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Association Des Eleveurs v. Rob BontaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- James Dehoog v. Anheuser-Busch Inbev sa/nvCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Robillard v. Opal Labs, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018
- Eric Sorenson v. Joanne SorensonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
246 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.