Legal Opinion
Horack v. Franchise Tax Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 23, 1971No. Civ. 10443PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GARDNER, P. J.
This is an appeal from an order granting a petition for writ of mandate in which the trial court ordered the Franchise Tax Board to return to petitioners certain monies which had come into their possession by reason of the arrest of petitioners on a narcotics offense.
The facts of the case are as follows: A neighbor called the police and advised that three “hippie type” persons had entered what she believed to be a vacant residence next door. The police first went to the home of the neighbor-informant, but found that she had departed. The officers then *366went to the house in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Horack v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. SkinnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Aronoff v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Environmental Law Fund, Inc. v. Town of Corte MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Tyler v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- People Ex Rel. Franchise Tax Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- CITY OF OAKLAND, CAL. v. Hotels. Com LPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- People v. FreenyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.