Legal Opinion
South Peninsula Hospital v. Xerox State Healthcare LLC
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided September 30, 2016No. Case No. 3:15-cv-00177-TMBPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
TIMOTHY M. BURGESS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is now before the Court on Defendant Xerox State Healthcare, LLC’s (“Xerox”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint. The Court heard oral argument on Xerox’s motion on June 29, 2016.1 Based on the arguments presented in the parties’ briefs and at oral argument, and for the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES Xerox’s motion to dismiss at docket 35.
II. BACKGROUND
a. Procedural History
Plaintiffs South Peninsula Hospital (“South Peninsula”), Alaska Speech and Language…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cruise Lines Int'l Ass'n Alaska v. City & Borough of JuneauDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2018
- Snead v. WrightDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2025
- Van v. LLR, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 2020