State of Minnesota v. Jose Arriage Soto, Jr.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LILLEHAUG, Justice.
In sentencing, district courts have a great deal of discretion. Rarely do we hold that it has been abused. But rarely is not never. This is such a rare case.
Appellant Jose Soto pleaded guilty to first-degree criminal sexual conduct for a ■violent rape. The Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines called for an executed sentence of 12 years in prison. Instead, the district court stayed Soto’s prison sentence and put him on supervised probation. The State appealed. The court of appeals reversed and remanded for execution of the 12-year sentence. State v. Soto, No. A13-0997,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. TrogSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Jane Doe 136 v. Ralph LiebschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Jacob Miles SolbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- State v. IvyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.