State v. Trog
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
The sole issue on this sentencing appeal by the state pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 244.-11 (1980) is whether the district court erred in staying execution of sentence in a case in which the Sentencing Guidelines recommend execution of sentence. We hold that the district court did not err and we therefore affirm.
Defendant was charged with several offenses but reached an agreement with the prosecutor which permitted him to plead guilty to one offense, burglary with assault, Minn.Stat. § 609.58, subd. 2(l)(b) (1980), in exchange for the prosecutor’s agreeing to dismiss the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. CizlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
3Cited by79 opinions
- State v. BackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. BertschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. BrusvenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State of Minnesota v. Jose Arriage Soto, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.