Legal Opinion
Williams v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 25, 2018No. A16-1526; A16-1527PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILDEA, Chief Justice.
In this case we are asked to decide which party has the burden to prove the accuracy of the defendant's criminal-history score when a defendant brings a motion to correct his or her sentence under Minn. R. Crim. P. 27.03, subd. 9, after the time to file a direct appeal has expired. Appellant Tramayne Colfred Williams brought motions under the rule, arguing that two Minnesota district courts miscalculated his criminal-history score because those courts treated his two Illinois drug-related convictions as felonies. The district courts denied the motions. The court of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Hoyt Properties, Inc. v. Production Resource Group, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- United States v. Anthony J. Pivorotto, John Robert Woods. John Robert WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- State v. MaurstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- United States v. Herbert Lee RollersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. CurtisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- State v. StrobelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- Reichel Foods, Inc. v. Proseal America, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
- Sorenson v. MBI, IncDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.