Legal Opinion

Miller v. Botwin

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 14, 1995No. 71,703PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Abbott, J.:

This is a lawsuit by Victor Miller, an attorney, to recover attorney fees from Arnold Botwin, M.D., based on a written contingency fee agreement. Botwin counterclaimed; seeking to have the trial court declare the contingency fee agreement unenforceable and for the trial court to determine a reasonable fee. Following a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment in favor of Miller in the amounts ' of $59,675.53 and $5,523, plus prejudgment interest, and $110.35, representing expenses advanced. Botwin appeals, and Miller cross-appeals.

The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lightcap v. Mobil Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  2. Kilner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  3. Marcotte Realty & Auction, Inc. v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  4. Mark Twain Kansas City Bank v. CatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  5. Wilson v. American Fidelity InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Stovall v. MeneleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  2. Bouten Construction Co. v. H.F. Magnuson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Owen Lumber Co. v. ChartrandSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. Varney Business Services, Inc. v. PottroffSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  5. Blair Construction, Inc. v. McBethSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API