Legal Opinion
Wirth v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 6, 1944No. A-10326PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarefoot, J.
Emil Wirth was charged in the county court of Garfield county with the crime of driving a motor vehicle upon the public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, was tried, convicted, sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and costs, and has appealed.
In his petition, defendant sets out ten assignments of error, but in his brief urges only three, as follows:
“First proposition: Error of the trial court in overruling defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence.
“Second proposition: Error of the court in failing to give the instructions Nos. 1 and 2 requested by the defendant.
“Third…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matthews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
- Nott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- Luellen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
- Barfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942
3Cited by13 opinions
- Farmer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
- Hurt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955
- Hancock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.